Battery Materials Testing

Mixed Hydroxide Precipitate (MHP) Testing

Sterling Analytical provides mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP) testing, quantifying nickel and cobalt grade alongside the iron, manganese, and magnesium content that determines MHP quality and downstream processing requirements. MHP has become one of the most important intermediate products in battery-grade nickel and cobalt supply, produced from nickel laterite ore through high-pressure acid leaching (HPAL) and increasingly treated as a near-equivalent to Class 1 nickel for battery cathode applications.
The HPAL route that produces MHP is a genuinely significant upgrading process: laterite ore typically containing around 1% nickel and 0.8% cobalt is leached, purified, and precipitated into MHP running roughly 40% nickel and 3% cobalt — a substantial concentration of value into a much smaller, more processable material. But that upgrading process doesn’t remove every impurity equally well, and the specific impurities that remain — iron, manganese, magnesium chief among them — directly affect how much further processing MHP needs before it’s suitable for battery-grade nickel and cobalt sulfate production.
Our laboratory supports nickel laterite processors, battery materials refiners, and traders handling MHP at various points in this supply chain, from initial HPAL plant output through to material ready for sale or further refining.
Mixed Hydroxide Precipitate (MHP) Testing

How MHP Is Made, and Why It Matters for What You're Testing

Understanding the HPAL process that produces MHP helps make sense of what a given MHP sample’s composition actually tells you. Laterite ore is leached with sulfuric acid at high temperature and pressure (commonly around 250°C), producing a pregnant leach solution (PLS) containing nickel, cobalt, and a substantial amount of dissolved iron — iron is typically the single largest impurity in the leach solution by mass, since laterite ores are iron-rich. Before nickel and cobalt can be precipitated as MHP, this iron has to be selectively removed, generally through pH-controlled precipitation that takes advantage of iron’s different precipitation behavior relative to nickel and cobalt.
Once iron removal is complete, the purified solution is neutralized — commonly with magnesium oxide, lime, or sodium hydroxide — to precipitate nickel and cobalt together as mixed hydroxides. This is where MHP gets its name, and where its remaining impurity profile is largely set. Manganese, when present in the leach solution, tends to co-precipitate with nickel and cobalt through what’s understood to be an oxidative mechanism distinct from straightforward hydroxide precipitation, which is part of why manganese content can be sensitive to precipitation conditions in ways that are harder to control than a simple pH adjustment might suggest.

What We Test For

Nickel and cobalt grade are reported as the primary value metrics, with the full impurity panel providing the data needed to assess refining requirements and material value.

Why Iron Content Is the First Thing We Look At

Iron deserves particular attention in MHP testing because it’s both the most abundant impurity and the one most directly tied to upstream process performance. Since laterite ore is iron-rich and iron has to be removed from the pregnant leach solution before nickel and cobalt precipitation, the iron level in a finished MHP sample is essentially a report card on how well that upstream iron removal step performed.
Elevated iron in MHP isn’t just a grade dilution issue — it adds real cost and complexity to downstream refining, since further iron removal is generally required before the material can be processed into battery-grade nickel and cobalt sulfate. A consistent pattern of elevated iron across multiple MHP lots from the same source can point toward a systematic upstream process issue worth investigating, rather than normal lot-to-lot variation.

MHP vs. MSP: Why the Distinction Matters for Interpreting Results

MHP isn’t the only intermediate product HPAL operations can choose to produce. Mixed sulfide precipitate (MSP) is the main alternative, made by treating the same pregnant leach solution with hydrogen sulfide instead of a basic precipitation reagent. MSP typically runs at higher nickel grade (around 55% nickel is a commonly cited figure) than MHP, but the hydrogen sulfide process used to produce it involves handling a genuinely hazardous gas, which has made some operators favor MHP despite its somewhat lower grade and higher impurity load.
This matters for interpreting MHP test results because the two materials aren’t directly comparable on a simple grade basis — MHP’s lower nickel percentage relative to MSP reflects the precipitation chemistry used to produce it, not necessarily a quality problem, and MHP has increasingly proven capable of being processed through the same downstream refining equipment used for nickel briquettes, powder, or oxide, which is part of why it gained industry acceptance despite carrying higher impurity levels than some alternatives. Understanding which intermediate product a given sample represents — and what grade and impurity profile is actually typical for that product — matters more than comparing raw numbers across different intermediate types.

Common Quality Issues We Identify

Who Uses This Service

Sample Quantity & Packaging

Required sample size: 10–20 grams of representative MHP, typically as a wet or dried filter cake.

Packaging guidelines:

Turnaround Time & Pricing

Standard turnaround: 3–5 business days Rush service: 24–48 hours available
Pricing starts from $150 per sample, depending on element panel and whether moisture/dry-basis correction is required.

What You Receive

Clients receive a detailed Certificate of Analysis (COA) suitable for material valuation, refining decision-making, and process monitoring.

Your COA includes:

All results are supported by CRM-traceable calibration, with duplicates and matrix spikes performed on each analytical batch — important when results directly inform material valuation or refining decisions.

Methods & Standards

Sterling Analytical applies established methods adapted for MHP and related laterite-processing intermediates:

Explore related services:

Request a Quote

Ready to get started with MHP testing?
Submit your sample details to receive a fast quote and recommended analytical scope.

Frequently Asked Questions

It's used to verify nickel and cobalt grade and quantify the iron, manganese, and magnesium impurity content that determines MHP quality and refining requirements, supporting material valuation, refining decisions, and process monitoring.
Iron is typically the largest impurity by mass in MHP, carried over from incomplete upstream iron removal during HPAL processing. Elevated iron adds cost and complexity to downstream refining and can indicate an upstream process issue worth investigating.
MSP is the main alternative HPAL intermediate, typically higher in nickel grade (around 55%) but produced using hazardous hydrogen sulfide gas. MHP runs at lower grade with higher impurity load but has gained acceptance because it processes through the same refining equipment used for nickel briquettes, powder, or oxide. The two aren't directly comparable on raw grade alone since they reflect different precipitation chemistry.
MHP has emerged as an increasingly important nickel source for battery applications, processed differently from traditional sulfide-derived Class 1 nickel but capable of being refined into equivalent battery-grade material. Comparing impurity profiles between sources is relevant for sourcing and refining decisions.
Manganese co-precipitates with nickel and cobalt through an oxidative mechanism distinct from straightforward hydroxide precipitation, making it sensitive to precipitation conditions in ways that aren't always intuitive from pH alone.
10–20 grams of representative MHP, typically as wet or dried filter cake.
Standard turnaround is 3–5 business days, with 24–48 hour rush service available.
Yes, where known. This helps with interpreting results relative to a dry-basis specification, since wet filter cake moisture content can vary and affects how grade percentages should be read.